Queen Anne Style (Thursday Doors)
assymetirical
but mirrored—until altered
by human hands, time
These two buildings caught my attention, due to the painted trim. I couldn’t decide if I liked it or not. But I took photos. A little research showed that they had been altered (a repeating story), each in its own slightly different way, since they were designed by Edward Angell in the late 1900s. You may remember Angell as the architect of two other buildings I’ve photographed for Thursday Doors–the brownstones with the Juliet balconies, and the building with Six Happiness door.
Originally private homes, but now apartments, the steps were removed, as so often happens, and the door placed on the garden level, with the original doorway becoming a window. In the case of #46, this was done quite tastefully.
Number 44 is a totally different story–I know Queen Anne style, the dominant architectural style Angell used for these houses, features asymmetry, but this takes it a bit too far. This door is under the original doorway, though, while #46 also changed the location of the door.
As you can see above, the upper floor of #46 has been raised, and one window made larger, but they kept the window surround. I think they should have enlarged the other window as well.
The houses were designed to be asymmetrical mirror images, and they mostly still are. Asymmetry is one of the main components of Queen Anne Style, along with cantilevered windows and decorative trim, often multicolored. The white window frames work better than the black ones I think. Notice that Angell once again provided Juliet balconies.
For some strange reason, not all the decorative trim is painted..
The Daytonian has another detailed history of both these houses. Number 44 was the headquarters of the Nippon Club in New York from 1905-1912, and then a music school for a few years. The residents of both houses had the usual complicated lives. Read all about it, and see a photo of how the houses originally looked, here.
And visit Dan Antion, the host of Thursday Doors, here, to see more doors and add some of your own.







I am such an architectural nut. My dad ran an engineering/architectural firm when I was growing up. Big one. So perhaps I come by it honestly. I agree with your suggestions. But of course we can’t do anything about these things! 😂😉❤️
LikeLiked by 2 people
Unfortunately not. Thanks Bela.
My daughter has a degree in architecture but ended up as a real estate lawyer…(still the knowledge is useful sometimes)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think anything we gain knowledge of is meant to enrich whatever we’re doing now. I’ve found it so, time and again, in my life. But I have a degree in …! What good will that do me in ‘this’ job? Or … I’m working doing ‘this’ – how does that further my trajectory along the path i had designed? Well, they’ve all played in somehow in my life: sales/marketing, degree in depth Psych, owned and ran a restaurant, degree in interior design, worked on bodies, ended up running several contracting businesses for my husband. And I’ve written for fun and profit all these years. ALL has played into everything else. Carry on! xoxo
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree–everything we learn is useful in often surprising ways.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t it?!
LikeLiked by 1 person
These are delightful looking buildings. I appreciate your detailed review and your thoughts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Dan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for including a link to the history of the two houses. I was particularly interested in seeing how the buildings originally looked.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Liz. I’m always interested in the original appearance of buildings, but often I can’t find it. So I’m glad that in this case the photo was available.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome, Kerfe. I’m always interested in the original appearance of historic buildings as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It looks a lot different now than back in its original state. I read most of the history at the other site. Fascinating what a pedigree some of these old places have.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Jade. I’m coming to believe that humans are just chaotic, all of them. We just never had the means to make their histories easily accessible before.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kerfe, as you get to know the stories of these places, they have to start feeling like friends 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
It does make me feel more integrated into the streets I walk.
LikeLike
I kind of like the painted parts and agree that the white trim looks better on the windows. They’re still pretty despite the changes. And interesting histories, Kerfe. Thanks for sharing another interesting building with some lovely details. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Diana. It would be better if the building owners had at least coordinated their changes! But individuality is the American Way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that some coordination would have been nice. But who knows the reasons they didn’t. Still a pretty building!
LikeLiked by 1 person
OK, me likes asymmetry well enough, but here, no balance. #46 has added amusement of wonderful design right beside a towering overflow of garbage. Today you’re making me miss days of wandering San Francisco and the almost jarring mix of old and modern (no camera then, pooh).
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is often jarring, isn’t it? We are a conglomerate nation in all ways.
LikeLike
Hi Kerfe, this detailed comparison is very interesting. I agree that the white window trim works better but the door for #46 is much nicer.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks Robbie. I think you are right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your descriptions are so thorough! Love these 😌
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks David. I’m always disappointed when I can find any history about the doors I photo. I was lucky again with these!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such interesting buildings. I like the painted trim, at least the way it looks in the photos. It makes me think of pottery.
In addition to being misaligned, that brick doorway just looks out of place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Merril. They ought to require more careful scrutiny of these renovations. But I suppose there’s too much going on to consider each case.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess unless something has protected historic status, they don’t really scrutinize. Well, in a city that large, I imagine it’s hard to keep track.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There are a few big emotional fights about land use, and everything else is secondary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the info on the details. I rather like the trim. I agree that continuity among the owners might make a difference. Thanks for sharing (K).
Pat
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Pat.
LikeLike
Great building and historical marvels, Kerfe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!
LikeLike
Welcome 🙏🏼
LikeLiked by 1 person
So fascinating. No. 44 looks like it’s manifesting from an alternate universe! Did you ever read China Miéville’s “The City and the City”? It gives me vibes from that book, of parallel nations occupying the same urban space-time but the people of one city learn to ignore the other. PS I loved Davis’ “Duplex”! I’m still thinking about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly like “The City and the City”! but all of life seems that way right now to me. I haven’t thought about that book in a long time, but the feeling of it is very much like everything I seem to be reading and thinking about lately (maybe it’s me…) Time keeps getting more and more confusing.
I’m still thinking about “Duplex” too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I enjoyed reading the history of this place. The robbery must have been a shock. Who steals silk?? But then different times they lived in. Very interesting!
LikeLike
I do like the painted trim. Lovely doors!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Brenda.
LikeLike
Fascinating! It is always interesting to know the facts behind the facades.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is–I’m always happy when I have a story to go with the doors.
LikeLiked by 1 person